Subject: Legal Proceedings

Seven subpoenas and a court decision from the Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, pertaining to the case of James Batts versus Sulzbacher Bros. Grocers. The subpoenas, issued in September 1888, summon various individuals to testify. A handwritten court decision, dated February 12, 1889, reinstates the case without costs to the plaintiff. The nature of the dispute is not explicitly revealed in the surviving documents. Numerous handwritten notations are present on the backs of the subpoenas.

Seven subpoenas and a court decision from the Davidson County Circuit Court in Nashville, Tennessee, related to the case of James Batts vs. Sultzbacker Bros. Grocers. The subpoenas, dated September 1888, summon several witnesses to testify. The court decision, dated February 12, 1889, reinstates the case without costs to the plaintiff. The nature of the dispute is not fully revealed in these documents. Handwritten notations are present on the back of several subpoenas.

Collection of seven subpoenas and a court decision from the Davidson County Circuit Court, Tennessee, related to the case of James Batts v. Sultzbacker Bros. The subpoenas, dated September 1888, summon several individuals to testify. A handwritten court decision, dated February 12, 1889, reinstates the case without costs to the plaintiff. The specific nature of the dispute remains unclear.

This legal document is a deposition given by Levy Andrew Levy on June 14, 1817, concerning a land transfer in Cherry Valley, New York. Michael Gratz and George Croghan questioned Levy about the transfer of land between Michael and Bernard Gratz and George Croghan, which occurred in 1779. Levy was 82 years old at the time of the deposition. The document originates from the Gratz Collection in Canada and the Nathan Family Archive.

This legal document contains the argument of Mr. Alfred A. Cohen, counsel for the plaintiff, George W. Tyler, in the case of Tyler vs. Annie A. Pratt in the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, 1877. The case concerns the payment owed to the plaintiff for his services in obtaining a divorce decree for the defendant in a prior case. The document, published by Francis & Valentine Commercial Printing in San Francisco, provides insight into the legal proceedings and the personal details of those involved, including accusations of perjury and debauchery. The book is 61 pages, 8vo, in original printed wrappers.

Collection of seven subpoenas and a court decision from the Davidson County Circuit Court in Nashville, Tennessee, pertaining to a case between James Batts and Sultzbacker Bros. Grocers. The documents date from September 1888 to February 1889. The subpoenas summon various individuals to testify, while the court decision reinstates the case without costs to the plaintiff. Handwritten notations are present on the backs of the subpoenas.

Seven subpoenas and a court decision from the Davidson County Circuit Court in Nashville, Tennessee, related to the case of James Batts v. Sulzbacher Bros. Grocers. The subpoenas, issued in September 1888, summoned various individuals to testify. A subsequent court decision, dated February 12, 1889, reversed an earlier ruling, reinstating the case without costs to the plaintiff. Handwritten notations appear on the reverse of each subpoena.